Coordination problems make difficult the taxation of fuels used in international transport, but there are many economic reasons to pursue such a policy – to say nothing of environmental and fiscal concerns. This column argues that efficiency gains from correcting externalities and replacing more distortionary taxes make this daunting task worth pursuing.
Michael Keen, Ian Parry, Jon Strand, 09 September 2014
Cameron Hepburn, 30 October 2012
The EU’s Emissions Trading System includes all flights to, from and within Europe as eligible for regulation – something that has faced strong opposition from the US and China. With Airbus’s orders from China falling, the pressure has grown from within Europe. This column argues that for reasons of economic principle, legality and practicality, the EU should stand its ground.
Most Read
Vox eBooks
Events
-
19 - 19 February 2020 / Milan, Italy / SUERF and UniCredit Foundation
-
13 - 13 March 2020 / London / UK Network for Environmental Economists
-
20 - 20 March 2020 / University of Paris Nanterre / EconomiX-CNRS and the Doctoral School EOS (Université Paris Ouest - Nanterre La Défense), CeReFiM (University of Namur), LFIN (Université Catholique de Louvain-Louvain School of Management) and LEO (Université d'Orléans)
-
25 - 26 March 2020 / London, United Kingdom / Bank of England, CEPR and Imperial College
-
27 - 27 March 2020 / San Francisco / Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco
