With the US presidential election turning on a handful of swing states, suspicion arises that an incumbent could ‘buy’ the election by shifting the federal government’s state-level spending to critical states. This column reports ongoing research that suggests this is not likely to be the case. Voters do not seem to reward presidents for more federal spending on private contracts in a given state. As such, it does not seem that Obama could buy votes in swing states such as Ohio using his power as the incumbent.
Related
-
Enrico Spolaore, Romain Wacziarg
Most Read
-
Hötte, Somers, Theodorakopoulos
-
Doepke, Hannusch, Kindermann, Tertilt
-
Harrison
-
Hartmann, Leonello, Manganelli, Papoutsi, Schnabel, Sigaux
-
Attinasi, Gerinovics, Gunnella, Mancini, Metelli
-
Burgess, Sievertsen
-
Eichengreen, O'Rourke
-
Mitze, Kosfeld, Rode, Wälde
-
Heldring, Robinson
-
Allen
Blogs&Reviews
-
Carraro, Cœuré, Dhand, Eichengreen, Mills, Rey, Sapir, Schwarzer
-
Evenett
-
Fullerton, Levinson
-
Hoffmann, Moench, Pavlova, Schultefrankenfeld
-
Reichlin, Adam, McKibbin, McMahon, Reis, Ricco, Weder di Mauro
Events
-
7 July - 1 December 2022 / Zoom webinar /
-
11 - 11 July 2022 / online / SUERF - The European Money and Finance Forum BAFFI CAREFIN Bocconi University
-
11 - 13 July 2022 / / National Council of Applied Economic Researach (NCAER)
-
13 - 13 July 2022 / / CEPR and WIPO
-
8 - 19 August 2022 / Online / Harvard Kennedy School Executive Education
CEPR Policy Research
-
Gobillon, Solignac
-
Giglio, Maggiori, Stroebel, Weber
-
Summers, Fatás
-
Favero, Galasso
-
Butt, Churm, McMahon, Morotz, Schanz
-
Eichengreen, Avgouleas, Poiares Maduro, Panizza, Portes, Weder di Mauro, Wyplosz, Zettelmeyer
-
Baldwin, Beck, Bénassy-Quéré, Blanchard, Corsetti, De Grauwe, den Haan, Giavazzi, Gros, Kalemli-Ozcan, Micossi, Papaioannou, Pesenti, Pissarides , Tabellini, Weder di Mauro
-
Baldwin, Nakatomi
-
Thimann
-
Goodhart, Perotti