Much of financial regulation has been focusing on adequately pricing risk taking by lenders. This column argues that a multinational deposit insurance system such as the proposed European Deposit Insurance Scheme has important advantages, but can also create conflicts among its member nations due to potential deposit insurance subsidies that differ across nations. The authors suggest alternative design features that could minimise these subsidies and make a multinational deposit insurance system more mutually agreeable.
Related
-
Donato Masciandaro, Francesco Passarelli
Most Read
-
Krugman
-
Terzi
-
Goldstein, Levy Yeyati, Sartorio
-
Aghion, Artus, Oliu-Barton, Pradelski
-
Daly, Chankova
-
Eichengreen, O'Rourke
-
Burgess, Sievertsen
-
Mitze, Kosfeld, Rode, Wälde
-
Heldring, Robinson
-
Eichengreen
Blogs&Reviews
-
Hebous
-
Gylfason
-
Beetsma, Schuknecht
-
Bouwens
-
Gaspar, Larraín Bascuñán
Vox eBooks
Don't Miss
Arezki, Djankov, Panizza
Bartsch, Bénassy-Quéré, Corsetti, Debrun
Scheuer
Events
-
21 - 21 April 2021 / Online /
-
21 - 23 April 2021 / Online /
-
22 - 22 April 2021 / online / SUERF and UniCredit Foundation
-
22 - 22 April 2021 / Online /
-
22 - 22 April 2021 / Online /
CEPR Policy Research
-
Gobillon, Solignac
-
Giglio, Maggiori, Stroebel, Weber
-
Summers, Fatás
-
Favero, Galasso
-
Butt, Churm, McMahon, Morotz, Schanz
-
Eichengreen, Avgouleas, Poiares Maduro, Panizza, Portes, Weder di Mauro, Wyplosz, Zettelmeyer
-
Baldwin, Beck, Bénassy-Quéré, Blanchard, Corsetti, De Grauwe, den Haan, Giavazzi, Gros, Kalemli-Ozcan, Micossi, Papaioannou, Pesenti, Pissarides , Tabellini, Weder di Mauro
-
Baldwin, Nakatomi
-
Thimann
-
Goodhart, Perotti