Clinical practice guidelines recommend treating all patients with similar attributes the same way. This column argues that, under conditions of uncertainty or ambiguity, this may be bad advice. Treating similar patients differently provides two benefits. The first is diversification – assigning similar patients to different treatments limits the consequences of choosing an inappropriate treatment. The second benefit is that randomly assigning treatments helps clinicians learn which ones are most effective.
Related
-
Leandro de la Escosura, Joan R. Rosés, Isabel Sanz Villarroya
Most Read
-
Danielsson
-
Funke, Schularick, Trebesch
-
Diao, Ellis, McMillan, Rodrik
-
Behrens, Kichko, Thisse
-
Goodhart, Masciandaro, Ugolini
-
Eichengreen, O'Rourke
-
Burgess, Sievertsen
-
Mitze, Kosfeld, Rode, Wälde
-
Heldring, Robinson
-
Eichengreen
Blogs&Reviews
-
Bouwens
-
Gaspar, Larraín Bascuñán
-
Evenett
-
Arezki, Rota-Graziosi
-
Gual
Vox eBooks
Don't Miss
Arezki, Djankov, Panizza
Bartsch, Bénassy-Quéré, Corsetti, Debrun
Scheuer
Events
-
4 - 4 March 2021 / Zoom webinar / World Trade Organization
-
10 - 10 March 2021 / Online /
-
11 - 11 March 2021 / Online /
-
12 - 12 March 2021 / Online /
-
15 March - 31 May 2021 / Online /
CEPR Policy Research
-
Gobillon, Solignac
-
Giglio, Maggiori, Stroebel, Weber
-
Summers, Fatás
-
Favero, Galasso
-
Butt, Churm, McMahon, Morotz, Schanz
-
Eichengreen, Avgouleas, Poiares Maduro, Panizza, Portes, Weder di Mauro, Wyplosz, Zettelmeyer
-
Baldwin, Beck, Bénassy-Quéré, Blanchard, Corsetti, De Grauwe, den Haan, Giavazzi, Gros, Kalemli-Ozcan, Micossi, Papaioannou, Pesenti, Pissarides , Tabellini, Weder di Mauro
-
Baldwin, Nakatomi
-
Thimann
-
Goodhart, Perotti