Mobilisation for WWII is typically credited as having spurred the industrialisation of the American South, where industrial development had previously been stymied. Using newly collected data, this column revisits this hypothesis. Unlike earlier studies, the results do not support a decisive role for wartime capital deepening on the South’s post-war industrial development. While the results don’t rule out some positive effects of WWII investment, they suggest it may have had limited usefulness in post-war, non-military production.
Most Read
-
Morikawa
-
Terzi
-
Goldstein, Levy Yeyati, Sartorio
-
Taneja, Mizen, Bloom
-
Aghion, Artus, Oliu-Barton, Pradelski
-
Eichengreen, O'Rourke
-
Burgess, Sievertsen
-
Mitze, Kosfeld, Rode, Wälde
-
Heldring, Robinson
-
Eichengreen
Blogs&Reviews
-
Hebous
-
Gylfason
-
Beetsma, Schuknecht
-
Bouwens
-
Gaspar, Larraín Bascuñán
Vox eBooks
Don't Miss
Arezki, Djankov, Panizza
Bartsch, Bénassy-Quéré, Corsetti, Debrun
Scheuer
Events
-
13 - 13 April 2021 / Online /
-
14 - 14 April 2021 / Online /
-
14 - 16 April 2021 / Online / The CEPR Network on Household Finance, EDHEC and Think Forward Initiative (TFI).
-
16 - 16 April 2021 / Online /
-
20 - 20 April 2021 / Webinar /
CEPR Policy Research
-
Gobillon, Solignac
-
Giglio, Maggiori, Stroebel, Weber
-
Summers, Fatás
-
Favero, Galasso
-
Butt, Churm, McMahon, Morotz, Schanz
-
Eichengreen, Avgouleas, Poiares Maduro, Panizza, Portes, Weder di Mauro, Wyplosz, Zettelmeyer
-
Baldwin, Beck, Bénassy-Quéré, Blanchard, Corsetti, De Grauwe, den Haan, Giavazzi, Gros, Kalemli-Ozcan, Micossi, Papaioannou, Pesenti, Pissarides , Tabellini, Weder di Mauro
-
Baldwin, Nakatomi
-
Thimann
-
Goodhart, Perotti