Under a welfarist approach, tax policy is judged on its implications for the well-being of those in the society to which it applies. An implicit vulnerability of this approach is that judgements are based on necessarily incomplete cost and benefit calculations. This column investigates people’s preferences for welfarist and non-welfarist approaches by exploring responses to envy. A narrow majority of respondents reject a redistribution of resources that raises overall welfare by assuaging envy. These respondents seem to be using non-welfarist principles to encode concerns about indirect policy consequences.
Related
-
Romain Rancière, Amine Ouazad
Most Read
-
Woloszko
-
Chronopoulos, Kampanelis, Oto-Peralías, Wilson
-
Lalive, Magesan, Staubli
-
Ugarte, Olarreaga
-
Caffarra, Scott Morton
-
Eichengreen, O'Rourke
-
Burgess, Sievertsen
-
Mitze, Kosfeld, Rode, Wälde
-
Heldring, Robinson
-
Eichengreen
Blogs&Reviews
-
Sapir
-
Bouchaud, Farmer
-
Baldwin
-
Kende
-
Angeloni
Vox eBooks

Bartsch, Bénassy-Quéré, Corsetti, Debrun, 15 December 2020
Don't Miss
Bartsch, Bénassy-Quéré, Corsetti, Debrun
Scheuer
Bozio, Garbinti, Goupille-Lebret, Guillot, Piketty
Events
-
18 January - 22 March 2021 / online / Political Economy of International Organization
-
21 - 23 January 2021 / Online /
-
28 - 29 January 2021 / Online - Zoom / Timberlake Consultants
-
29 - 29 January 2021 / Online /
-
12 - 12 February 2021 / Online / Erasmus University Rotterdam, Tilburg University and the University of Amsterdam
CEPR Policy Research
-
Gobillon, Solignac
-
Giglio, Maggiori, Stroebel, Weber
-
Summers, Fatás
-
Favero, Galasso
-
Butt, Churm, McMahon, Morotz, Schanz
-
Eichengreen, Avgouleas, Poiares Maduro, Panizza, Portes, Weder di Mauro, Wyplosz, Zettelmeyer
-
Baldwin, Beck, Bénassy-Quéré, Blanchard, Corsetti, De Grauwe, den Haan, Giavazzi, Gros, Kalemli-Ozcan, Micossi, Papaioannou, Pesenti, Pissarides , Tabellini, Weder di Mauro
-
Baldwin, Nakatomi
-
Thimann
-
Goodhart, Perotti