Political pundits have argued that owning financial assets induces households to support business-friendly political parties. This column analyses how ownership of liberty bonds – mass marketed to US households during WWI – affected voting behaviour in the 1920s. Voters responded to fluctuations in the value of the bonds by punishing incumbents when their value fell, and rewarding them when bond values recovered. Although liberty bonds contributed significantly to Republican margins in the 1920s, they don’t appear to have been decisive.
Most Read
-
Danielsson
-
Funke, Schularick, Trebesch
-
Diao, Ellis, McMillan, Rodrik
-
Behrens, Kichko, Thisse
-
Pradelski, Oliu-Barton
-
Eichengreen, O'Rourke
-
Burgess, Sievertsen
-
Mitze, Kosfeld, Rode, Wälde
-
Heldring, Robinson
-
Eichengreen
Blogs&Reviews
-
Bouwens
-
Gaspar, Larraín Bascuñán
-
Evenett
-
Arezki, Rota-Graziosi
-
Gual
Vox eBooks
Don't Miss
Arezki, Djankov, Panizza
Bartsch, Bénassy-Quéré, Corsetti, Debrun
Scheuer
Events
-
10 - 10 March 2021 / Online /
-
11 - 11 March 2021 / Online /
-
12 - 12 March 2021 / Online /
-
15 March - 31 May 2021 / Online /
-
16 - 16 March 2021 / Online /
CEPR Policy Research
-
Gobillon, Solignac
-
Giglio, Maggiori, Stroebel, Weber
-
Summers, Fatás
-
Favero, Galasso
-
Butt, Churm, McMahon, Morotz, Schanz
-
Eichengreen, Avgouleas, Poiares Maduro, Panizza, Portes, Weder di Mauro, Wyplosz, Zettelmeyer
-
Baldwin, Beck, Bénassy-Quéré, Blanchard, Corsetti, De Grauwe, den Haan, Giavazzi, Gros, Kalemli-Ozcan, Micossi, Papaioannou, Pesenti, Pissarides , Tabellini, Weder di Mauro
-
Baldwin, Nakatomi
-
Thimann
-
Goodhart, Perotti