Covered interest parity is close to a physical law in international finance, yet it has been consistently violated since the Global Crisis. Violations since 2014, once banks had strengthened their balance sheets and regained easy access to funding, are especially puzzling. This column argues that the violation reflects a combination of foreign exchange hedging demand and tighter limits to arbitrage. Hedging demand has been boosted, in particular, by divergent monetary policies in an ultra-low interest rate environment, while tighter limits to arbitrage result from a stricter management of banks’ balance sheets.
China’s debt – in particular its corporate debt – is large by historical and international standards. This column argues that of greater concern is the sharp increase in recent years, and that the vulnerability is heightened by the concentration of this debt in old industries that suffer from overcapacity and weak competitiveness. The authorities appear to be only now taking steps to halt the rise in corporate debt, but as prior episodes of banking crises show, this is unlikely to be enough to avert either a prolonged period of slowing growth or a financial crisis in the medium term.
Product market reforms are seen as a way to boost output in advanced economies, but we know little about their short-term impact. This column presents data from 18 advanced economies that reveal large differences in the potential upside of reform depending on the sector in which a firm operates, its size, and its financial health.
The UK may opt to leave the EU Emissions Trading System. This column argues that as the UK is a large importer of emission permits, this would make meeting its climate policy targets much harder and dearer, and would remove the legal standing of many permits circulating in the rest of the EU. Some non-EU countries do take part in the Emissions Trading System, and this appears to be the best option for the UK post-Brexit. If not, the UK Government will be forced into a major overhaul of its climate policy.
The objective of financial stability policy is unclear. Is it the resilience of the financial system, avoiding the costs of systemic collapse, or managing the credit cycle, containing the costs of resource misallocation and over-indebtedness? This column argues that the answers have serious implications for what can decently be delegated to independent ‘macroprudential authorities’, but have barely been debated in those terms.
Other Recent Columns:
- The minimum wage and infant health
- Negative interest rate policies: Channels and consequences
- A framework for measuring tasks across occupations
- A new approach to valuing architectural amenities
- A tax policy guided by public opinion on inequality
- After 2004, EU accession countries increased trade with Australia
- How to regulate CEO pay (and how not to do it)
- Natural resource extraction and local business constraints
- How computer automation affects occupations
- Rethinking inflation targets for long ZLB episodes
- Multinational firms and corporate culture across countries
- ESBies: Safety in the tranches
- Income inequality in a globalising world
- Political foundations of the lender of last resort
- Competition and sorting: Evidence from Bundesliga football
- Consumption network effects
- Trade globalisation in the last two centuries
- MERCOSUR is not really a free trade agreement, let alone a customs union
- Health insurance competition and consumer welfare
- The VIX and its derivatives