The Crisis affected public spending. Research and innovation is one area often highlighted as needing protection. This column does not find strong evidence that European countries sacrificed research and innovation more than other government expenditure. However, there is strong heterogeneity across countries. Innovation lagging and fiscally weak countries cut R&I spending while innovation-leading forged it ahead. Research of this divide and long-term growth is still limited.
It is well-known that World War I was expensive for Britain. The indirect economic costs were also huge. This column argues that the adverse implications of the Great War for post-war unemployment and trade – together with the legacy of a greatly increased national debt – significantly reduced the level of real GDP throughout the 1920s. A ballpark calculation suggests the loss of GDP during this period roughly doubled the total costs of the war to Britain.
Headquarters play important strategic roles in modern companies, but downsizing of headquarters is often advocated as a cost-cutting measure. This column presents evidence from Japanese firm-level data that headquarters size is positively associated with firms’ overall productivity. Moreover, the benefits of ICT are greater for companies with relatively large headquarters. Downsizing headquarters to cut costs may thus be harmful for long-term company performance.
Among the various explanations behind global imbalances, the role of corporate saving has received relatively little attention. This column argues that corporate saving is quantitatively relevant, and proposes a theory that is consistent with the stylised facts and useful for understanding the current phase of global rebalancing. The theory implies that, while the economic contraction originating in developed countries has pushed interest rates towards the zero lower bound, the recent growth slowdown in emerging countries could push them out of it.
The landscape of portfolio investment in emerging markets has evolved considerably over the past 15 years. Financial markets have deepened and become more internationally integrated. The mix of global investors has also changed, with more money intermediated by mutual funds. This column explains that these changes have made capital flows and asset prices in these economies more sensitive to global financial shocks. However, broad-based financial deepening and improved institutions can enhance the resilience of emerging-market economies.
Other Recent Articles:
- Firm growth and large jumps
- Minority mortgage market and the Crisis
- How can we measure media power?
- Pricing and EZ membership: Evidence from Latvia
- How to jumpstart the Eurozone economy
- Nominal GDP targeting for developing nations
- Ballooning finance
- The economics of density: Evidence from the Berlin Wall
- Maternal grief and child outcomes
- Corporate governance reform in Japan
- The economic fruits of patience
- The decline in labour force participation in the US
- Great Depression recovery: The role of capital controls
- Growth escalators and growth convergence
- African growth looking forward
- The unrecognised benefits of grade inflation
- Secular stagnation: Facts, causes, and cures – a new Vox eBook
- Is there a ‘taste for discrimination’?
- Are foreign takeovers getting domestic cherries or lemons?
- Heterogeneity in the value of life